Monday, November 29, 2010

Hubble Discovers new "Life" in an Ancient Galaxy

Hubble Discovers new "Life" in an Ancient Galaxy
November 18, 2010
Elliptical galaxies were thought to be aging star cities whose star-making heyday was a billion years ago. But NASA’s Hubble Space telescope, has helped prove that elliptical galaxies still have some “youth” in the, thanks to an encounter with small galaxies. Images of the core of NGC 4150, taken in near-ultraviolet light with the sharp-eyed Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3), have helped reveal streams of gas, dust, and clumps of new born blue stars that are less than a billion years old. The evidence is shown, that the star birth was activated due to a merge with a dwarf galaxy.
This new study, has helped to create the belief that maybe, in all elliptical galaxies, there might still be young life, in order to bring old elliptical galaxies their life back.
"Elliptical galaxies were thought to have made all of their stars billions of years ago," says astronomer Mark Crockett of the University of Oxford, leader of the Hubble observations. "They had consumed all their gas to make new stars. Now we are finding evidence of star birth in many elliptical galaxies, fueled mostly by cannibalizing smaller galaxies.
The Hubble images reveal turbulent activity inside the galaxies core. The young blue stars, create a ring around the center that is rotating with the galaxy. The stellar-breeding ground is about 1,300 years-light across. Long strands of dust are seen against the yellowish color of the core, which is composed by older stars. From a Hubble analysis, of the stars colors, Crockett and his team measured that the star-formation boom started about a billion years ago, which is a relatively recent event in cosmological science. The star making has slowly stopped since then.
"We are seeing this galaxy after the major starburst has occurred," explains team member Joseph Silk of the University of Oxford. "The most massive stars are already gone. The youngest stars are between 50 million and 300 to 400 million years old. By comparison, most of the stars in the galaxy are around 10 billion years old."
The encounter that triggered the star birth would have been similar to our own Milky Way galaxy, swallowing whole the nearby Large Magellanic cloud.
For every major encounter, there are probably up to 10 times more frequent clashes between a large and a small galaxy. Major collisions are easier to see because they create fireworks: galaxies, long streamers of gas, and dozens of young star clusters. Smaller interactions are harder to detect because they leave relatively little trace.
Crockett and his team selected NGC 4150 for their Hubble study because a ground-based spectroscopic analysis gave tantalizing hints that the galaxy's core was not a quiet place. The astronomers hope to study other elliptical galaxies in the SAURON survey to look for the signposts of new star birth. The team's results have been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal.“The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of international cooperation between NASA and the European Space Agency. NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center manages the telescope. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) conducts Hubble science operations. STScI is operated for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., in Washington, D.C”.
This article interested me, because when I was away in summer, I saw this IMAX video in a museum, about how galaxies were formed, and how about stars. Then another day, I saw another video talking about the repairs over the years made in the Hubble Space Telescope, and how astronauts were trained to do this task. I also think this interested me, because of the name, when I saw it i said I had to read it, because I thought it was like life, live something that lived, but when I clicked on it, it was about how galaxies that were billions of years old still had young stars. For me, reading all of these articles found in the NASA web page, is really important, because I aspire to become part of NASA when I grow up, and knowing about this things that are happening in the program now, has to be important somehow. I think that it is also important that we know about this things, because we are all very closed minded, and we only think of what we know and what is a fact, most of the time we like to stick with things that we know. Some people just like to know what they know and don’t try to strive for higher knowledge. I on the other hand, I always want to know more, and be more aware of what is going on in the world, because I think it is very important to know what is going on around us, even though its billions of years from Earth.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Pet Frogs Can Transmit Salmonella


PET FROGS CAN TRANSMIT SALMONELLA
October 22, 2010


Pet African dwarf frogs harboring salmonella have sickened at least 113 people, most of them children, researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report.
“This is the first multistate outbreak of salmonella associated with frogs,” says Shauna Mettee, a public health nurse at the CDC in Atlanta who presented the findings October 22 in Vancouver, Canada, at a meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
CDC investigators became curious when doctors began reporting a spate of cases of the typhimurium subspecies of salmonella in 2009. Between April 2009 and March 2010, Mettee and her colleagues identified 113 cases of this infection, three-fourths occurring in children under age 10. The average age of the patients was 5. Symptoms ranged from cramping to severe and even bloody diarrhea. There were no fatalities. Bacteria transmission took many forms. For example, one woman cleaned a frog aquarium in the kitchen sink and subsequently bathed a 3-week-old infant in it, Mettee says.
The researchers traced the infected frogs to a single breeding facility that houses 800,000 to 1 million African dwarf frogs and sells them. Health authorities are now working with the facility’s owner to create a cleanup procedure to limit the salmonella within the animals.
Amphibians and reptiles can carry salmonella bacteria without appearing sick, says Patricia Griffin, a physician and chief of the enteric diseases epidemiology branch at CDC. She notes that pet turtles, which were popular in the 1970s, were found to expose people to salmonella. Small turtles have since been banned as pets, but some street sales continue, Mettee says.
Since March 31, an additional 57 cases of the salmonella subspecies have been reported. Mettee and her colleagues are now checking whether these cases also trace to frogs from the same breeding facility.
I think I choose this article, because when I was little I used to go to the pet store, and see the pet frogs in the fish tanks, and tell my mom I wanted one, and every time we went to the store I said the same thing. Luckily I never got one, because it would have been bad if I had gotten a frog and had salmonella. I think I chose this article because it interested me on how a frog that seems harmless and that is kept as a pet, could make such harm to you, like getting salmonella. I think I also thought of this article, because it took me back all this years of wanting a pet frog, but I think I don’t want it anymore. I really think that people should be aware of this, because I see lots and lots of people buying salamanders, and frogs, and amphibians, without the knowledge that they might give them a disease, so I think people should read the news a little better, just to know what’s going on.

Monday, September 27, 2010

New Magma Layer Found Deep in Earth's Mantle?

Sofia Terife
Mr. Wilkinson
Science 8
September 27, 2010
New Magma Layer Found Deep in Earth's Mantle?

September 23, 2010
Couple of days ago, scientists found out there was a layer in Earth, which was unknown until now. This is a layer of hot liquid magma, trapped in the Earth’s formation on about 1,800 miles below our feet, new research shows.
Research states that once upon a time, the solid layer beneath the Earth’s crust housed an ocean of magma, and that some of the remains are still there. "Some models consider the [early] Earth to have been completely or largely molten, and people are looking for possible remnants or relics of this molten state," said study co-author Guillaume Fiquet.
As these models suggest that as the Earth hardened, there were still parts which stayed molten, probably in the mantle-core c boundaries. In a new experiment, Fiquet and other scientists showed what would happen to the minerals in the Earth’s mantle, if they were exposed to the unbearable heat and pressure of that boundary between the mantle and the core of the Earth. Their findings not only explained about the structure of the earth, but also about how some volcanoes, might get their magma from places very close to the core to the Earth.
Based on the way seismic waves travel through Earth, scientists believe that the Earth has a solid core made of solid iron ball, surrounded by a layer of molten hot iron. Above the core there is the solid lower mantle, the upper mantle, and the Earth’s crust. There is no way to take a sample from the insides of the Earth, so there is no way for people to know for sure if the mantle's boundary rocks are solid or liquid. But scientists have long recorded the seismic activity; the sudden drops in the speed of seismic waves when it comes near the mantle-core boundary, thanks to this, scientists speculate that, this boundary is partially melted.
This article interested me, because I think that it’s really interesting to know what makes up the Earth’s core, and insides. I personally like science, I have always been a big fan of science, and I think that just knowing how the Earth is made is interesting, because we really need to know about where we live. We really don’t know how it formed itself or whether it’s molten rock, or solid rock. I think that it’s really important to know about this. A connection I could draw to my life is that until now, I knew about the structure of the Earth one way, and now they discovered this layer, that might or not be there, and it will change the model I once knew. There is not much that can be drawn to my life with this article actually, but mostly that I like it because I like science.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

NASA's Kepler Mission Discovers Two Planets Transiting the Same Star

August 26, 2010

NASA's Kepler Mission Discovers Two Planets Transiting the Same Star

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/news/two_planet_orbit.html

This article is about a two planets orbiting the same star, in a similar manner as our own solar system. The transit of these two planets was observed through the data of the sun-like star, designated Kepler-9. The two planets were named, Kepler-9b and Kepler-9c. The discovery of the two planets includes a seven month research, of about 156,000 stars, which was a part of the on-going search for earth-size planets outside our solar system. Kepler, the telescope, has an ultra precise camera, which captures the brightness of the stars, and how the brightness decreases in the star when a planet transits around it. The size of the planet can be estimated thanks to this dips. The distance of the planet is also estimated by measuring the time of the successive dips of the planet orbiting the star. The variations and the regularity of this dips, help scientist determine the mass of the planet.

Observations on the mass of the planets, state that Kepler-9b is bigger than Kepler-9c, but both have similar masses to but less than Saturn. Kepler-9b lies closest to the star with an orbit of about 19 days, while Kepler-9c has an orbit of about 38 days. By observing several transits by each planet over the seven months of data, the time between successive transits could be analyzed.

"This discovery is the first clear detection of significant changes in the intervals from one planetary transit to the next, what we call transit timing variations," said Matthew Holman, a Kepler mission scientist from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass. "This is evidence of the gravitational interaction between the two planets as seen by the Kepler spacecraft."

In addition to the two giant planets, there is also a possibility that a third planet is around, much smaller, but still orbits the star. Additional observations are required to determine whether this signal is indeed a planet or an astronomical phenomenon that mimics the appearance of a transit.
This article really interested me at first, when I was reading the newspaper one day, because I thought that this was a great discovery for mankind. I think that its really interesting because we always think that our solar system is the only one that exists, when actually there are thousands discovered by powerful telescopes yearly. When I read the article in the newspaper I immediately looked for it in the NASA web page, and it was one of the main news. Before reading the whole article, I thought that it had been discovered by the Hubble Space Telescope, which is one of the most powerful telescopes invented, and it has proved many theories of the scientists. But then I saw that it was from the Kepler telescope, which I knew little about. So I found this article very interesting, and it makes me think that there could really be more life outside of our planet.

I can connect this article to our lives, because we, as human beings are, sometimes, really closed minded. Since all the planets of our solar system were discovered, we have thought that we are the only living thing in the universe. Personally I think that this happens because we really didn’t know what else was out there before all the telescopes were launched. I don’t think we might be the only living thing in the vast universe, but as far as we are concerned we are one of the only known planetary systems, which have planets orbiting a star, in our case the Sun. By thinking this, I think that this article really interested me, because it made me think that maybe, we are not the only living things in the whole universe, and that there are other planetary systems like ours.